International Film Critique

I recently had the chance to view Ip Man, an international martial arts film made in 2008 and directed by Wilson Yip. The film is entirely in Cantonese with English subtitles and stars Donnie Yen, Simon Yam, Ka Tung Lam, Siu-Wong Fan, Lynn Hung, Hiroyuki Ikeuchi, Tenma Shibuya, Yu  Xing, Chen Zhi Hui, and You-Nam Wong.

Ip Man starts the audience off in 1935 Fo Shan, China. At the time, Fo Shan was renowned for its martial arts practices and had many schools teaching various forms of hand-to-hand fighting. The film follows the titular character, Ip Man, a Master of the Wing Chun form of martial arts. As one of, if not the best and most respected martial arts Masters in a community of over 300,000 people Ip Man lives a life of fortune and happiness with his wife, Cheung Wing-Sing, and young son, Ip Chun. Everything changes when China is invaded by the Japanese in 1937. The subjugated people of Fo Shan are killed by brutality and starvation; the population of Fo Shan is whittled down to a mere 70,000 people. Everyone is affected by the occupation; Ip Man and family are evicted from their home and are forced to live an abject lifestyle. Ip Man makes strides to protect his family and his people. Through duels and impromptu fights Ip Man eventually gains the attention of Miura, the Japanese General, and challenges him to a duel. Upon winning, Ip Man is shot and the outraged community rebels against their oppressors.

Ip Man takes a look at moral principles and uses characters and events to juxtapose different schools of thought. Ip Man’s calm demeanor is often contrasted with the rage and violence of characters around him. Always seeking for good, Ip Man is the white knight on who the entire community can depend. Very early on in the film, Ip man has a friendly, private duel with a Master of a neighboring school. The duel is accidentally seen by another man retrieving a kite from a tree who later tells the whole town and leads the embarrassed Master to demand satisfaction. Ip Man intervenes, is threatened by a police officer and effortlessly disarms him and treats him to dinner. In this sequence an unforgiving code of pride is extinguished as quickly as the the juxtaposed flagrant brandishing of firearms as a source of individual power is disarmed and kindness rushes to replace it. These juxtapositions happen throughout the film. The defection of a main character to Japan’s army stands contrasted with Ip Man’s patriotism and loyalty to the Chinese people.

Everybody is human and the actual Ip Man is no exception, however, I think the filmmakers chose to show him as in such an infallible light because that way he becomes a symbol of what the view should strive to be like. The filmmakers want to show that there are multiple ways of responding to situations but in every instance, there is an appropriate path and Ip Man is meant to teach the audience that path. He does this generally by example, but also through a few profound, thought provoking statements.

Ip Man’s message is one of tolerance, honor, integrity, and dedication. I found the morals the film presented engaging and compelling. I feel that our society cares less and less about those traits which were once deemed honorable; the development of which worthwhile. Now our moral compass doesn’t point north, its ability to direct our people eroding little by little. What once was north may now be south. What the Ip Man makes me feel is that there is still a reason to do good, that it does make a difference, even as the protagonist made a difference in his world by holding fast to those principles.

It was refreshing to see such a movie that was so morally compelling as well as highly entertaining. It seemed to never have a dull moment and helped me to see that the careful application of dedication to a cause will pay off in the end. I was actually quite surprised to see the Japanese in such a different light. As the main antagonist, Japan seems brutal, violent, and full of an over-zealous sense of conquest. This was very different than my views of the Japanese going into the movie. My wife and I had just finished watching The Last Samurai which shows the Japanese in a very different light. I think Ip Man helped to expand my perspective of the Japanese and Chinese cultures as well as their relationship. I know that both Ip Man and The Last Samurai have very embellished plots but the perspectives of those who made the films about that culture still shines through the work. The creators of Ip Man have a tainted view of the Japanese because of what they did at this time to their people. I think it is wise to consider this perspective and contemplate why it exists, because there must be a valid reason for presenting the Japanese with such cruelty.

Ip Man helped me see another culture in a whole new light. The majority of exposure to the chinese lifestyle came from my childhood visits to Chinatown and poorly dubbed kung-fu movies, creating in my mind an image of cheap products and a propensity for violence. Ip Man was made by filmmakers who have lived their lives in China and are able to tell a much more complete story than Shanghai Nights ever could. The filmmakers showed traditional Chinese architecture and dress. Little shops in crowded streets filled with people who know each other’s names. The speech of the people of Fo Shan was largely shown as very respectful, with a totally different sense of humor than what I’ve grown accustomed to. I could tell that some parts of the film were meant to be seen as funny, but I they just didn’t make me laugh.

I learned about the Sino-Japanese War, which started before and eventually merged with WWII and ended when Japan surrendered after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I’m actually a little ashamed I didn’t know anything about it before. I knew that the Japanese had invaded China, but I thought that was limited to post December 7, 1941 WWII Japanese conquest.

This film was definitely more artistic than the standard Hollywood summer blockbuster. As I watched the film I got the feeling the filmmakers poured their heart and souls into making this film come to life. It also differed in that despite being made fairly recently, Ip Man uses no computer graphics. Additionally, unlike other notable Chinese films like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Ip Man doesn’t use and wires for it’s combat sequences; instead it’s all expertly choreographed by Sammo Hung and brought to life by talented actors.

I noticed that in the beginning of the film the filmmakers chose to do most everything in brighter colors. After the Japanese army moves in the colors all change to well-lit but very under saturated tones. The music was also more typical of Asian countries with heavy falling drum beats with strong string accompaniment, leaving out the classic rock and roll style music found in many Hollywood pictures. It’s interesting as well that in many intense scenes instead of relying on the music to help the audience feel the importance of scene the filmmakers chose to let silence and solid acting performances do the work, and with much success, in my opinion.

One final but important thing I noticed about the film was that there was violence, yes, but not excessive violence coupled with sex. The film was devoid of anything scandalous and instead focused on the importance of relationships between friends and family, oftentimes dropping hints about the importance of caring for and spending adequate time with one’s family.

I would highly recommend Ip Man – it’s now at the top of my favorite foreign films list.

 

Free or Equal?

The following is a series of questions and responses based on the Free or Equal documentary on Free to Choose, a network dedicated to providing information on economics. In Free or Equal, Swedish author, commentator and Cato Senior Fellow Johan Norberg takes us through some of Milton Friedman’s economic theories by showing us some of the places that inspired his ideas.

Before this assignment, I knew nothing about Hong Kong’s incredible rise from the slums to one of the most productive economies in the world. Along with many others, Free or Equal gives Hong Kong’s history as proof that a free market economy is the fastest way to lower poverty and higher standards of living. It’s interesting to compare very regulated economies to those with few regulations. I am reminded of our own economy and its apparent turn towards a more regulatory government.

While I admit I’m not generally in favor of fill in the blank assignments, this one did force me to listen to every word in hopes that I didn’t miss something from the questions. This in turn made me think critically about the information that was pouring through my screen. Is is true? Was Estonia’s modern economy founded on principles applied after their leader read Milton Friedman’s book? Does this offer substantive proof that they work? In my experience, people say a lot of things but the proof is in the pudding. What happens as information is applied? Does it work or does it not? In this case, I have to lean towards yes; it does work and the proof is in all those countries that gave trial to Friedman’s ideas. You really cannot have freedom and equality of outcome. Please, read on to explore this concept further.

Free or Equal Questions

While watching Free or Equal, complete the following statements for questions 1-9. Use the precise language from the video. Question 10 asks you to analyze a proposal and provide your unique perspective.

1. Professor Milton Friedman’s research led him to believe in the power______of and______.

  1. free markets
  2. economic freedom

2. If the government gives everybody the same freedom to work . . . some will do better than others. The result will be ____ , but not ____ .

  1. equality of opportunity
  2. equality of outcome

3. After World War II, Hong Kong became a refugee camp with millions of extremely poor people. Hong Kong had no _______, no _____________ and little _______________________. But almost by accident it was given ____________________________. . . . As a result, Hong Kong became an ___________________.

  1. prospects
  2. natural resources
  3. land that could be cultivated
  4. economic freedom
  5. economic powerhouse

4. In the small Baltic country of _________, Prime Minister Mart Laar took his inspiration from Professor Friedman’s book Free To Choose. What three things did he do to imitate the Hong Kong model?

  1. Estonia
  2. Zero tariffs
  3. Flat taxes
  4. Minimum (economic) regulation

5. Adam Smith’s concept of the “invisible hand” was illustrated in the example of buying a tomato. The following 3 points were made:

We vote with our ____________.

Every purchase ______________ .

To make your life better, you have to ____________________.

  1. pocketbooks
  2. send a message
  3. better the lives of others.

6. Economists call the constant renewal of the economy _______________. To increase our wealth and opportunities, we have to stop doing old things in __________ and start doing innovative things in ___________.

  1. creative destruction
  2. old ways
  3. better ways.

7. Swedish entrepreneurs are the ________ in the world. Young Swedes and entrepreneurial immigrants have moved from Sweden to Britain and the U.S. because the ______ are much greater there, where ______ are lower.

  1. oldest
  2. rewards
  3. taxes

8. The Founding Fathers had learned the lesson of history. The great danger to freedom is the ___________________, especially in the hands of a ________________.

  1. concentration of power
  2. government.

9. As Milton Friedman said, “The society that puts equality before freedom will _________________________. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a __________________________________.”

  1. end up with neither.
  2. great measure of both.

10. Short answer

Professor Friedman compares the concept of “equality of opportunity” to a race where everyone begins at the starting line at the same time. In contrast, “equality of outcome” guarantees that everyone finishes at the same time. Today, “equality of outcome” is referred to as “fair shares for all.”

If we applied the “fair shares for all” concept in this class, all students would receive an average grade of “C.” This would be accomplished by taking points away from students earning A’s and B’s to give to students earning D’s and E’s. Distributing points equally would result in “fair grades for all.”

Would you approve of this method in calculating your final grade? Why or why not?

How would this differ from “fair shares for all” economically?

For example, what’s the difference between a successful student being required to give up some of his/her hard-earned grade and a successful person being expected to give more of his/her hard-earned income? If you support “redistribution of income and wealth,” shouldn’t you also be willing to redistribute academic grades? After all, many of your fellow students may not have had the advantages in education and upbringing that you’ve had.

Address the above questions in your own words, in a minimum of 3 paragraphs.

I would not approve of a “redistribution” method of grading. It doesn’t make sense, just like redistribution of wealth makes no sense. Money is a commodity. If someone were to take a farmer’s harvest, split it up ten ways and give it to other farmers who didn’t do well, the harvest’s value would be lost and the farmer would not reap the reward of his effort. The first farmer whose heart and soul went into producing a crop to sell and make money to put towards his family and farm for clothes, new tools and food on the table, is now making less. Maybe he’s still doing okay financially, but he’s a producer and now his producing power has been limited by people who were not able to produce. Maybe they didn’t produce because they weren’t worried about the consequences. Maybe those farmers knew in the end, even if they didn’t fertilize this time or water another time that they would still get a little something even if their money died in the hole they buried it in. That’s as good as burying dollar bills for the worms to eat.

Think about it, when somebody makes an effort to get a good grade that effort shows through their GPA and college transcripts. A future employer would see that hard work reflected in grades and potentially reward that applicant with a good job and steady income. People do what they have always done. If they’ve worked hard and received good grades they’re more than likely going to do the same in employment. This now producing member of society is going to be very productive and add a great deal of value to the company.

If grades were redistributed however, a poor student may suddenly be able to get a job he or she really doesn’t qualify for. From the employers point of view, the grades various applicants got in school are no indication of who was a producer and who was a leech. If no other screening methods are used, the employer would more than likely get someone with a history of mediocre performance who will add little value to the company. The company is now less productive, does fewer tasks in less efficient ways, and it’s competitive edge will be blunted. Prices go up, quality goes down, and everything slowly blends into a foggy pea soup of mediocrity.

Redistribution, or “safety net” schemes limit the impact of failure, one of humanity’s greatest fears. A lack of consequences for one’s actions, be it moral, physical, or financial, cause people not worry about what might happen if they don’t try hard enough; someone will always be there to catch them. A “fair shares for all” economy, like a “fair shares for all” grading system would mean stagnation and putrefaction. Why work hard when my government check will keep me well fed and entertained? Why try when someone will earn my grade for me?

Fat America

America’s waistline is growing at a phenomenal rate. In fact, previous to 2010, the CDC used to use a scale that had a range from 10% to greater than 35% of total accounts of self-reported obesity per state. They’ve since scrapped that scale as there isn’t a single state below 20% of total populous obesity. Most everybody knows that eating better, exercising more, and making an effort live a more healthy lifestyle are good things but it is easy to forget ‘why.’ Obesity rates continue to rise, reaching unprecedented levels. These astronomically high levels of obesity are a relatively new threat to humanity, and education is the only real weapon against this deadly foe. Understanding things like what it means to have a healthy BMI, how obesity affects one’s wallet, and how children can learn an obese lifestyle from their parents can make trim obesity back a few notches and help ensure a thriving society for future generations.

The way doctors accurately determine one’s girth is through a number called body mass index or BMI. Simply put, BMI is one’s weight to height ratio and it is used because it generally correlates with the amount of body fat an individual has (“Defining Overweight and Obesity”CDC). One can have a high BMI and be overweight but not be obese. Having high BMI means that one has more weight than is healthy for their weight, while obesity is defined as having an excess of body fat (“Defining Overweight and Obesity” CDC). What’s the harm in a little pudge? The rolls aren’t really the problem but a symptom of the truth which lays beneath. They are one of the most direct indicators of how one is living their lifestyle. A high BMI is related to what’s known as metabolic syndrome, which according to the Mayo Clinic, is a cluster of conditions — increased blood pressure, a high blood sugar level, excess body fat around the waist and abnormal cholesterol levels — that occur together, increasing one’s risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The leading cause of death in America is, you guessed it, heart disease, with the only other close contender being cancer (“Heart Disease Facts” CDC).Low levels of exercise have been linked to children and adolescents with metabolic syndrome. Adolescents with metabolic syndrome are six times more likely to have low aerobic fitness as children (McMurray, Bangdiwala, Harrell, and Amorim).

Heart disease death rates in US. Image courtesy of CDC.

Percent of obese in US Adults. Image courtesy of CDC.

How does one gain weight in the first place? According to the CDC it’s all a matter of net calories (“Improving Your Eating Habits” CDC). Calories are energy that the body uses for fuel. When more calories are consumed than one’s body uses in a day some of those calories get stored as little energy packed fat cells. These fat cells are like a rainy day fund and are really quite ingenious. Think about it; if one didn’t have enough energy for their body to run it would die. These fat cells provide a little cushion (in more than one way) so that if you didn’t have food for a time one wouldn’t simply keel over and die. The problem comes when the body has more calories than it needs over an extended period of time. The human body is designed to continue to put away a little bit at a time into the rainy day fund and pretty soon the rainy day fund asks to open up another notch on the belt.

“Big Boned”

More and more evidence is being unveiled that the common excuses for obesity like, “I can’t help it, it’s in my genes,” are false. Statistically, genetic obesity is actually quite rare and because it generally takes a long time for genes to mutate in such a way that they affect a large portion of the population genes can basically ruled out as a cause of the surge in public obesity over the last 40 years (“Genes Are Not Destiny”).

The CDC states that, “Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents in the past 30 years (“Childhood Obesity Facts ” CDC).” Studies show that children whose parents are overweight or obese are at a higher risk for becoming obese themselves (“Obese Parents Influence Children’s Weight” URMC). Genes are to blame for a small percentage of childhood obesity but lifestyle habits learned and formed during childhood carry a bigger portion of the blame (“Genes Are Not Destiny” HSPH). These learned habits include diets high in fat and time spent inactive. The relationship between time children spend watching television and body fat is clear. Children, both boys and girls, who spend 4 or more hours per day in sedentary activities (TV) each day are likely to have more body fat and a greater BMI than those who spend less than two hours in such activities (Anderson, Crespo, Bartlett, Cheskin, and Pratt).

Rising rates of obesity and rising medical spending are undeniably linked. In 1998 total spending on obesity was estimated to be as high as $78.5 billion (that’s per year to those who may somehow think it insignificant), and about half of that came from Medicare and Medicaid (taxpayer money)(Finkelstein, Trogdon, Cohen, Dietz). From 1998 to 2006 obesity has been responsible for an increase of almost $40 billion per year in medical spending (Finkelstein, Trogdon, Cohen, Dietz).

And people wonder why are taxes continue to rise? According to the same study, those who are obese and on Medicare cost on average $600 more per person per year than those who are normal-weight and on Medicare. The costs of obesity are not just financial. Using data from 1994, a study on the costs of obesity says that America lost 39.2 million days of lost work due to obesity, effectively pulling down the economy (Wolf, Colditz). Obesity represents 5.7% the National Health Expenditure in the United States (Wolf, Colditz).

If left unchecked, it is projected that by 2030 86.3% of adults will be overweight or obese and 51.1% obese and by 2048 all american adults would become overweight or obese (Wang, Beydoun, Liang, Caballero, and Kumanyika). Can you imagine what obesity might cost America then? These staggering numbers will come true if nothing is done but fortunately numbers are not destiny; America is fighting a battle it can win. The most positive thing about America’s killer is that it’s completely preventable. There are key things one can do that will ensure victory over the fat plague.

The first key to battling obesity begins in one’s own home; it is to consider specific eating habits, both good and bad. What triggers or cues unhealthy eating? Triggers for unhealthy eating may be things that get one to eat when not really hungry, such as: sitting at home watching the news, leaving a candy dish in plain sight on the counter, or feeling bored or tired and thinking food might help raise one’s spirits.

Once triggers are identified you can begin to develop new habits. A new habits may be as simple as hiding junk food away. As one user from BodyBuilding.com puts it, “It’s less convenient to cheat when you have no cheat foods around to tempt you.” Eat full, balanced meals and carry a water bottle to sip during the day, and to think twice before loading a shopping cart with unessential, non-nutritional foods. Remember, it’s all a matter of net calories so start counting! Keep track – make a chart of net calories each day, adding calorie intake and subtracting calories for exercise. Using a fitness app like My Fitness Pal can be a big help.

Lastly, reinforcing these new habits by being accountable to oneself and to a loved one, like a spouse or other family member will help reach these goals. If one should find themselves snacking it may be helpful to ask questions like: Why do I do this? When did I start doing this? What changes do I need to make? Be patient. Developing new habits doesn’t happen overnight. A little slide here and there doesn’t mean one has“blown a whole day” of healthy habits. Another user from BodyBuilding.com says this on the suject of slipping while dieting:

“Eating excessively and falling off your diet should never make you feel bad. I love “junk” and I love to indulge on occasion. When you diet strays from your goal, you chalk it up to a bad (day/week whatever) and you get back to business.”

As one makes a concerted effort to change those habits and they will be able to. These three steps to overcoming unhealthy eating habits can be summed up in three words: Reflect – Replace – Reinforce (CDC).

What’s most ironic is that the America’s biggest killer isn’t crime, war, or even the bubonic plague but it’s own gluttony; the people’s biggest threat is so personal it’s wrapped around their middle. America doesn’t have to be known as fat America. The power to change course resides within each individual, but it will take more than well wished thoughts. Understanding what it takes to combat obesity and becoming a support system for those in need is within everyone’s responsibility. It’s up to all to work to shrink America’s waistline and by so doing keep a little more fat in it’s wallet.

Works Cited

Anderson, Ross E., PhD, Carlos J. Crespo, DrPh, MS, Susan J. Bartlett, PhD, Lawrence J. Cheskin, MD, and Michael Pratt, MD, MPH. “Relationship of Physical Activity and Television Watching With Body Weight and Level of Fatness Among Children.”Www.jamapeds.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <www.jamapeds.com/data/Journals/JAMA/4553/JOC71873.pdf‎>.

“Childhood Obesity Facts.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ed. CDC.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10 July 2013. Web. 25 Feb. 2014. <http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/obesity/facts.htm>.

“Defining Overweight and Obesity.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d. Web. 09 May 2014. <http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html&gt;.

Finkelstein, Eric A., Justin G. Trogdon, Joel W. Cohen, and William Dietz. “Annual Medical Spending Attributable To Obesity: Payer-And Service-Specific Estimates.” Health Affairs. Project HOPE, July 2009. Web. 28 Feb. 2014. <http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/28/5/w822.full.html>.

“Genes Are Not Destiny.” Obesity Prevention Source. Ed. Harvard. Harvard School of Public Health, n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2014. <http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-causes/genes-and-obesity/>.

“Heart Disease Facts.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19 Feb. 2014. Web. 08 May 2014. <http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm>.

“Improving Your Eating Habits.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ed. CDC.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 13 Sept. 2011. Web. 28 Feb. 2014. <http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/losing_weight/eating_habits.html>.

“Metabolic Syndrome.” Mayo Clinic. Ed. Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic, 5 Apr. 2013. Web. 03 Mar. 2014. <http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/metabolic-syndrome/basics/definition/con-20027243>.

Niosh. “Thread: Bad Eating Habits HELP.” Bodybuilding.com Forums RSS. N.p., 10 Feb. 2012. Web. 3 Mar. 2014. <http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=148622643>.

McMurray, Robert G., Shrinkant I. Bangdiwala, Joanne S. Harrell, and Leila D. Amorim.Adolescents with Metabolic Syndrome Have a History of Low Aerobic Fitness and Physical Activity Levels. Dynamic Medicine. N.p., 4 Apr. 2008. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://www.dynamic-med.com/content/7/1/5>.

“Obese Parents Influence Children’s Weight.” University of Rochester Medical Center. Ed. URMC. Online Medical Encyclopedia, n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?ContentTypeID=1&ContentID=713>.

Wang, Youfa, May A. Beydoun, Lan Liang, Benjamin Caballero, and Shiriki K. Kumanyika.Will All Americans Become Overweight or Obese? Estimating the Progression and Cost of the US Obesity Epidemic. Wiley Online Library. North American Association for the Study of Obesity (NAASO), 6 Sept. 2012. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2008.351/full>

Wolf, Anne M., Graham A. Colditz. Current Estimates of the Economic Cost of Obesity in the United States. North American Association for the Study of Obesity (NAASO), 6 Sept. 2012. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1550-8528.1998.tb00322.x/abstract>.

“Why People Become Overweight.” Harvard Medical School. Ed. Harvard. Harvard Medical School, n.d. Web. 02 Mar. 2014. <http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsweek/Why-people-become-overweight.htm>.

 

Moderating Future Shlock

One afternoon after work, a colleague of mine and I sat outside the office and, as we often did, contemplated the world around us. We got onto the topic of Big Brother and seeing Orwell’s ideas creep up in the world around us. It was then that he introduced me to some of the ideas Aldous Huxley wrote about in his book “Brave New World.” I had never before considered the possibility that it may not be through an ever-present, ever stronger government that our subjection comes but through our own selves; becoming complacent through entertainment.

Available on amazon. I highly recommend it!

Brave New World, Aldous Huxley

Neil Postman is the author of the book “Conscientious Objections: Stirring Up Trouble about Language, Technology, and Education” which was published by Knopf 1988. Postman Writes about the defeat of intelligence through what he and his colleagues call “Future Shlock,” adapted from his colleagues’ term ‘Future Shock’ which is “a way of describing the social paralysis induced by rapid technological change.” Postman uses the example of Hitler’s Germany before and during the second World War to highlight just one form of the social and intellectual degradation that befalls a society that allows itself to lose its agency. Postman himself writes, “this is what I wish to call to your notice: the frightening displacement of serious, intelligent public discourse in American culture by the imagery and triviality of what may be called show business. I do not see the decline of intelligent discourse in America leading to the barbarisms that flourished in Germany, of course… There are other ways to achieve stupidity, and it appears that, as in so many other things, there is a distinctly American way.” He goes on to explain that this American way is being ruined “not by what we fear and hate but by what we welcome and love.”

Postman himself brings up the differences between Orwell’s future and Huxley’s. He says that in Orwell’s people are controlled by inflicting pain but in Huxley’s they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. I agree with Postman that America’s future is not in totalitarian rule of a dictator but by steady doses of pleasure that lull is into a thought coma. While I agree that this is a more likely fate of our America I think that Postman’s views are a little extreme. Don’t misunderstand me when I say that; Postman’s voice is a clear warning and sometimes loud hellfire, condemnation and disaster is how the people need to hear it – it takes a lot to get through all those layers of desensitization to today’s problems – but his views are just a little overbearing.

Huxley’s future is not secured and while Postman is stuck with his head in a damp barrel, we all can make educated and informed decisions about how we deal with and moderate entertainment. There is danger in entertainment and I stress that straight and true word: moderation. Moderation is the compass to navigate the sea of entertainment in which we find ourselves. Instead of succumbing to the zombification that media can induce, use good judgment and say to yourself, “that’s enough, it’s time to go out.” As Postman himself puts it, “I [do not] make a complaint against entertainment. As an old song has it, life is not a highway strewn with flowers. The sight of a few blossoms here and there may make our journey a trifle more endurable.” It is not that media is inherently bad. No, it has its merits. It is that living through media is the cord that will bind us to the Huxleyan prophecy. Be free from bondage. Moderate yourself and your time. Be your own master and master your own will.

Here’s a link to Neil Postman’s essay: http://169.204.228.86/OurSchools/Hs/staff/jvoigt/APLanguage/Film%20Studies/NeilPostmanFutureShock.pdf